C1 Listening

C1Science and nature20 min

An interview with a restoration ecologist

A restoration ecologist explains why bringing a drained marsh back to life meant removing things rather than planting them.

Before you listen

You are going to hear a radio interview. The presenter asks questions and the guest, an ecologist, gives long, thoughtful answers. Listen for the points where she corrects a common assumption, and for how she shows that she is cautious about measuring success.

dormantadjective
alive but not growing or active for a timeThe seeds stayed dormant through the dry years.
crowd outphrasal verb
to take so much space that other things cannot grow or existFast-growing weeds can crowd out smaller plants.
scepticnoun
a person who doubts that something is true or will workThe first results convinced even the sceptics.
on the spotidiom
in the actual place where something happensThe insects respond to conditions on the spot.

Listen · 2:30

Radio interview: bringing a marsh back to life

Speed
Show the transcript (try the questions first)

Presenter: My guest today is Marisol Teixeira, a restoration ecologist who has spent eleven years bringing a drained river marsh back to life. Marisol, when people hear the word restoration, they picture planting. Is that the whole story?

Marisol: Far from it. In fact, our first four years involved hardly any planting at all. What we did was remove things. We blocked the drainage ditches and let the water return. Seeds had been lying dormant in the soil for decades, and once the ground was wet again, plants that nobody had seen since my grandmother's time simply reappeared.

Presenter: That sounds almost too easy.

Marisol: It would have been, had the water been clean. But the farmland upstream was washing fertiliser into the marsh, and that favoured a few aggressive reeds, which crowded out everything else. So we negotiated with the farmers to leave a strip of rough grass along the stream banks. Nobody was forced, and most agreed once they saw that the strip also reduced soil loss from their own fields.

Presenter: How do you know the project has worked? What counts as success?

Marisol: That's the hardest question, and I'd distrust anyone who gives a quick answer. We count bird species, which have risen from nineteen to forty-three, but birds can be misleading, because they fly in from elsewhere. I'm more reassured by the insects and the water quality, which respond to what's happening on the spot. And honestly, the real test is whether it still works after a flood.

Presenter: And has it been tested?

Marisol: Two winters ago, heavy rain pushed the river over its banks. The marsh absorbed so much of the water that the village downstream stayed dry, which, frankly, did more to win over the sceptics than any report I could have written.

Presenter: Were there people who opposed it?

Marisol: Plenty, at first. Some saw it as land going to waste. What changed minds wasn't an argument. It was the walking path. Once families could come and watch herons for themselves, the project stopped being mine and became theirs.

Presenter: If you could do it again, what would you change?

Marisol: I'd have started recording people's memories sooner. We kept careful data on plants, but almost none on what local people remembered of the old marsh, and some of the best guidance came from an elderly neighbour who recalled where the water used to pool. A great deal of knowledge was lost simply because we didn't think to ask.

Exercise 1 of 2

Attitude, opinion and inference

Listen and choose the best answer. Some answers are not stated directly.

  1. What misunderstanding does Marisol correct at the start?

  2. Why did plants reappear once the water returned?

  3. What went wrong because of the farmland upstream?

  4. Why did most farmers agree to the grass strips?

  5. What is Marisol's view of bird counts as a measure of success?

  6. What does Marisol imply about the flood two winters ago?

  7. Why does Marisol mention the walking path?

  8. What does Marisol regret about the project?

0 of 8 answered

Exercise 2 of 2

Listen for details

Listen again and type the missing word or number. You can write numbers as words or digits.

  1. Marisol has worked on the marsh for years.

  2. Almost no planting took place during the first years.

  3. The number of bird species has risen from nineteen to .

  4. The river flooded winters ago.

  5. Families can now come and watch from the walking path.

  6. Farmers agreed to leave a strip of rough along the stream banks.

0 of 6 answered

Source

Original script by Joy English, read by open-source text-to-speech voices (Kokoro-82M, Apache-2.0).

Levels are suggestions. Found a mistake? Tell us through the Contact page.