C1科学と自然20分
修復生態学者へのインタビュー
An interview with a restoration ecologist
修復生態学者が、水を抜かれた湿地を再生させるには、植えることではなく取り除くことが必要だった理由を説明します。
聞く前に
ラジオのインタビューを聞きます。司会者が質問をし、ゲストの生態学者が、長く思慮深い答えを返します。彼女がよくある思い込みを正している箇所と、成功の測定に慎重であることをどのように示しているかに注意して聞きましょう。
- dormant形容詞
- 生きてはいるが、しばらくの間成長も活動もしていないThe seeds stayed dormant through the dry years.
- crowd out句動詞
- 場所を大きく占めて、ほかのものが育ったり存在したりできなくなることFast-growing weeds can crowd out smaller plants.
- sceptic名詞
- あることが本当か、うまくいくかどうかを疑っている人The first results convinced even the sceptics.
- on the spot慣用句
- ある出来事が実際に起こる現場でThe insects respond to conditions on the spot.
聞く · 2:30
Radio interview: bringing a marsh back to life
スクリプトを表示 (まず問題に挑戦しましょう)
Presenter: My guest today is Marisol Teixeira, a restoration ecologist who has spent eleven years bringing a drained river marsh back to life. Marisol, when people hear the word restoration, they picture planting. Is that the whole story?
Marisol: Far from it. In fact, our first four years involved hardly any planting at all. What we did was remove things. We blocked the drainage ditches and let the water return. Seeds had been lying dormant in the soil for decades, and once the ground was wet again, plants that nobody had seen since my grandmother's time simply reappeared.
Presenter: That sounds almost too easy.
Marisol: It would have been, had the water been clean. But the farmland upstream was washing fertiliser into the marsh, and that favoured a few aggressive reeds, which crowded out everything else. So we negotiated with the farmers to leave a strip of rough grass along the stream banks. Nobody was forced, and most agreed once they saw that the strip also reduced soil loss from their own fields.
Presenter: How do you know the project has worked? What counts as success?
Marisol: That's the hardest question, and I'd distrust anyone who gives a quick answer. We count bird species, which have risen from nineteen to forty-three, but birds can be misleading, because they fly in from elsewhere. I'm more reassured by the insects and the water quality, which respond to what's happening on the spot. And honestly, the real test is whether it still works after a flood.
Presenter: And has it been tested?
Marisol: Two winters ago, heavy rain pushed the river over its banks. The marsh absorbed so much of the water that the village downstream stayed dry, which, frankly, did more to win over the sceptics than any report I could have written.
Presenter: Were there people who opposed it?
Marisol: Plenty, at first. Some saw it as land going to waste. What changed minds wasn't an argument. It was the walking path. Once families could come and watch herons for themselves, the project stopped being mine and became theirs.
Presenter: If you could do it again, what would you change?
Marisol: I'd have started recording people's memories sooner. We kept careful data on plants, but almost none on what local people remembered of the old marsh, and some of the best guidance came from an elderly neighbour who recalled where the water used to pool. A great deal of knowledge was lost simply because we didn't think to ask.
練習問題 1/2
態度、意見、推論
聞いて、最も適切な答えを選びましょう。直接述べられていない答えもあります。
練習問題 2/2
細かい点を聞き取る
もう一度聞いて、抜けている単語または数字を入力しましょう。数字は単語でも算用数字でも書けます。
Marisol has worked on the marsh for years.
Almost no planting took place during the first years.
The number of bird species has risen from nineteen to .
The river flooded winters ago.
Families can now come and watch from the walking path.
Farmers agreed to leave a strip of rough along the stream banks.
出典
Joy Englishのオリジナル台本を、オープンソースの音声合成(Kokoro-82M、Apache-2.0)で読み上げています。
レベルは目安です。間違いを見つけたら、お問い合わせページからお知らせください。