C2 Comprensión auditiva

C2Historia30 min

Una conferencia sobre cómo el ferrocarril estandarizó el reloj

A lecture on how railways standardised the clock

Una historiadora explica cómo los horarios del ferrocarril obligaron a las ciudades a renunciar a la hora solar local, y lo que costó en silencio ese cambio.

Antes de escuchar

Vas a escuchar a una historiadora dar una breve conferencia pública sobre la medición del tiempo en el siglo XIX. Tiene un sentido del humor seco y a menudo da a entender más de lo que dice. Presta atención a las causas del cambio y a lo que ella cree que se ganó y se perdió.

timetablesustantivo
lista de las horas a las que llegan y salen los trenes o los autobusesThe timetable showed a train every twenty minutes.
instrumentsustantivo
herramienta o dispositivo que se usa para medir o fabricar algoThe clock was an instrument of great precision.
surrenderverbo
renunciar a algo, a menudo a regañadientesThey had to surrender their old habits.
sustainverbo
mantener algo en marcha durante un largo periodoSmall daily habits sustain a friendship.

Escuchar · 2:32

Public lecture: the day the clocks agreed

Velocidad
Mostrar la transcripción (prueba primero las preguntas)

Today I want to talk about something so ordinary that we have stopped noticing it: the fact that, in this country, a clock in the north and a clock in the south agree. This was not always so, and the story of how it came about is, I think, a small masterpiece of unintended consequences.

Until the middle of the nineteenth century, every town set its clocks by the sun. Noon was whenever the sun stood highest overhead, and since the sun reaches that point later as one travels west, Bristol ran roughly ten minutes behind London, and Exeter about fourteen. Nobody found this alarming. A coach took days to complete a journey, and a few minutes of disagreement between two distant towns was simply lost on the road.

The railways changed that, not because anybody wished to reform timekeeping, but because a timetable is a promise made in minutes. A train that left London at nine could hardly arrive at a western station by a clock that insisted it was ten past. Passengers missed trains they had reached early. Station staff kept two sets of times. At least one famous clock in the west of England was fitted with two minute hands, one for local time and one for London time, which must have made it the most honest and least useful instrument in the county.

Consider the practical difficulty. A traveller arriving from a town further east would find that the station clock disagreed with the church clock, which in turn disagreed with the jeweller's window, and each of these authorities had its defenders. Shopkeepers, in particular, were reluctant to alter hours that their customers had always understood.

One company adopted London time along its whole line in eighteen forty, and others followed over the next few years. Yet the arrangement had no legal force. For decades a town could set its own time and be perfectly entitled to do so, and some did, out of pride, or stubbornness, or a suspicion that the capital was getting above itself. It was only in eighteen eighty that a law made one standard time official throughout the country. The telegraph helped enormously, since a signal sent along the wires could carry the exact time from an observatory to every station at once.

It would be tempting to call this progress and leave it there. But notice what was surrendered. Local noon had been a shared experience, tied to a place and a sky. Standard time replaced it with an agreement, and agreements are only as strong as the habits that sustain them. Within a generation, people were saying that the clock had always been like that, which is exactly how an invention succeeds: by being forgotten as one.

So the next time you glance at your watch, spare a thought for the passengers who missed trains they had reached early. They paid, in a very literal way, for a convenience you take entirely for granted.

Ejercicio 1 de 2

Argumento, tono e inferencia

Escucha la grabación. Elige la mejor respuesta. Piensa en lo que se da a entender además de en lo que se dice.

  1. What is the main subject of the lecture?

  2. Why did differences between town clocks cause little trouble before railways?

  3. Why does the speaker call a clock with two minute hands "the most honest and least useful instrument"?

  4. What does she mean by "a timetable is a promise made in minutes"?

  5. Why did some towns keep their own time after eighteen forty?

  6. What did the telegraph contribute?

  7. What does she think was "surrendered" with local noon?

  8. What does she mean by an invention succeeding "by being forgotten as one"?

0 de 8 respondidas

Ejercicio 2 de 2

Detalles clave

Escucha otra vez. Escribe una palabra o un número de la grabación para completar cada oración.

  1. Bristol ran roughly minutes behind London.

  2. Exeter was about minutes behind London.

  3. One company adopted London time along its whole line in .

  4. A law made one standard time official throughout the country in .

  5. Before railways, every town set its clocks by the .

  6. One famous clock in the west of England had two hands.

0 de 6 respondidas

Fuente

Guion original de Joy English, leído por voces sintéticas de código abierto (Kokoro-82M, Apache-2.0).

Los niveles son orientativos. ¿Has encontrado un error? Cuéntanoslo en la página de Contacto.