Joy English · 레벨 C2 · IELTS 유형joy-english.com

IELTS 스타일 쓰기: Task 2 논의형 에세이

이름:날짜:

IELTS Writing Task 2 스타일의 독립 연습이며 공식 시험이 아닙니다: 높은 수준의 논의형 에세이를 공부하고, 그 표현을 연습한 다음, 직접 답안을 써 봅니다.

알맞은 표현 고르기

각 발췌문을 완성하거나 에세이 표현에 관한 각 질문에 답하기에 가장 알맞은 선택지를 고르십시오.

___ preservation matters, it does not by itself justify a museum's existence.
- a) Despite
- b) Although
- c) However
- d) Because of
Which phrase introduces the most carefully hedged claim?
- a) Everyone knows that
- b) It is beyond all doubt that
- c) It could be argued that
- d) There is no question that
A paragraph that turns from one side of the argument to the other should begin with...
- a) Nevertheless,
- b) Similarly,
- c) For instance,
- d) As a result,
Which sentence has the most appropriate register for a formal essay?
- a) Museums gotta try harder to get people in.
- b) Museums are well advised to look for ways of attracting a wider audience.
- c) Museums should totally think about their visitors.
- d) It would be great if museums could sort this out.
Preservation keeps the evidence safe; engagement, ___, gives people a reason to care.
- a) on the contrary
- b) as a result
- c) for its part
- d) at any rate
Which is the best way to begin a conclusion?
- a) As everyone knows, museums are good.
- b) So that is why I wrote this essay.
- c) Finally, I want to say a few things about museums.
- d) On balance, I would maintain that both aims deserve support.
The task says Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Which plan answers it best?
- a) One paragraph on each view, a clear opinion stated early and confirmed in the conclusion
- b) Only the writer's own view, developed in four paragraphs
- c) A description of the history of museums
- d) Both views, with an opinion added only if there are words to spare
Which sentence makes a claim that is tentative but still specific?
- a) Such exhibitions always attract every kind of visitor.
- b) Such exhibitions may attract someone.
- c) Such exhibitions tend to attract audiences who might otherwise never visit.
- d) Such exhibitions have nothing to do with attracting people.

모범 답안 완성하기

모범 에세이의 표현에서 가져온 각 문장을 완성하는 단어를 하나 입력하십시오. 괄호 안에 단어가 있으면 필요에 따라 형태를 바꾸어 사용하십시오.

The danger of this approach ___ in fashion.
Topics that seem urgent now can look ___ within a decade.
Objects that are lost cannot be ___ (RECOVER) by later generations.
Preservation alone does not ___ (give a good reason for) a museum's existence.
A museum that chases headlines ___ becoming a magazine with a larger budget.
It is often their ticket money and goodwill that ___ for the conservation workshop.

쓰기 과제

어떤 사람들은 대학이 취업으로 직접 이어지는 과목만 가르쳐야 한다고 주장합니다. 다른 사람들은 고등 교육이 더 폭넓은 목적을 가져야 한다고 믿습니다. 두 견해를 논하고 여러분 자신의 의견을 제시하십시오.

260–340단어

내 글 확인

과제의 세 부분에 모두 답했습니다: 두 견해와 나 자신의 의견.
내 입장이 서론에서 분명하고 결론에서도 다시 분명합니다.
각 단락에는 이유나 예시로 뒷받침되는 하나의 중심 생각이 있습니다.
완곡 표현과 양보(예: tend to, Although, Nevertheless)를 자연스럽게, 너무 자주 쓰지 않고 사용했습니다.
정확하고 격식 있는 어휘를 사용했고 과제에 나온 단어를 되풀이하지 않았습니다.
문법, 철자, 문장 부호를 확인했고 분량을 대략 260-340단어로 유지했습니다.

정답

알맞은 표현 고르기

b) AlthoughAlthough는 양보절을 도입합니다. Despite와 Because of에는 명사구가 필요하고, However는 문장 부사여서 이런 식으로 두 절을 연결할 수 없습니다.
c) It could be argued thatIt could be argued that은 조심스러운 주장을 나타내며, 나머지는 단정적으로 들립니다.
a) Nevertheless,Nevertheless는 방금 한 말과의 대조를 나타냅니다.
b) Museums are well advised to look for ways of attracting a wider audience.격식 있고 정확하며 구어적이지 않기 때문입니다.
c) for its partFor its part는 두 번째 대상의 대응하는 기여를 덧붙입니다. On the contrary는 앞서 한 말을 부정하고, as a result는 원인과 결과를 암시합니다.
d) On balance, I would maintain that both aims deserve support.입장을 요약하고, 완곡 표현을 쓰며, 마무리하는 생각으로 자연스럽게 이어지기 때문입니다.
a) One paragraph on each view, a clear opinion stated early and confirmed in the conclusion과제는 첫 번째 견해, 두 번째 견해, 그리고 자신의 의견이라는 세 부분으로 이루어져 있으므로 세 가지 모두 분명해야 합니다.
c) Such exhibitions tend to attract audiences who might otherwise never visit.Tend to는 완곡 표현이고 문장의 나머지는 구체적입니다. 다른 선택지는 과장되었거나 내용이 없습니다.

모범 답안 완성하기

lies관용구는 lies in이며, 문제가 ~에 있다는 뜻입니다.
dated / outdated / old-fashioned / stale / obsolete / irrelevantDated (또는 outdated, old-fashioned)는 시간이 지나면서 주제가 시급성을 잃는다는 생각에 어울립니다.
recoveredcannot be 뒤의 수동 형태에는 과거분사가 필요합니다.
justify / warrantJustify는 '충분한 이유를 대다'라는 뜻이며 이 의미의 existence와 함께 쓰는 자연스러운 동사입니다. Warrant도 가능합니다.
risksRisk 뒤에는 -ing 형태가 오며 주어는 단수입니다.
pay / providePay for는 '그 비용을 대다'라는 뜻입니다. 복합 주어 ticket money and goodwill에는 복수 동사가 옵니다.

모범 답안

The question of what a university is for has rarely been more pressing, now that degrees are expensive and the labour market changes faster than syllabuses can be rewritten. While I accept that employability matters, I do not believe it should be the only yardstick.

Those who favour a strictly vocational curriculum make a reasonable point. Students and their families invest considerable sums, and it seems unfair to send graduates into the world with knowledge that no employer can use. A curriculum built around identifiable skills also offers a clarity that more open-ended study cannot, and it can open careers to people who lack family connections.

Nevertheless, a narrow approach carries risks of its own. Occupations that are in demand today may be obsolete by the time a cohort graduates, whereas the capacity to analyse evidence, write persuasively and learn unfamiliar material rarely goes out of date. Subjects with no obvious vocational purpose, such as philosophy or ancient history, are often where these capacities are most deliberately trained. Moreover, societies need more than a skilled workforce: they need citizens able to judge arguments, and it is hard to see how that ability could be acquired from training manuals alone.

On balance, I would argue that universities should pursue both aims, and that the apparent conflict is exaggerated. A degree in a practical field can be taught with intellectual rigour, and a humanities degree can include work placements or training in data skills. The task for institutions is to make these connections explicit, so that students understand what they are learning and why.