Joy English · Nivel C1 · Investigación y pruebasjoy-english.com
Test 1: Investigación, pruebas y duda
Nombre:Fecha:
Un test mixto avanzado sobre cómo se sopesan, se comunican y se ponen en duda las afirmaciones científicas: colocaciones, conectores, inversión y formación de palabras.
Parte 1: Huecos de opción múltiple
Elige la palabra o expresión que mejor completa cada frase.
- Journalists sometimes ___ the significance of a single small study, presenting tentative results as settled fact.
- The correlation was strong, but that does not ___ imply that one factor causes the other.
- Not until the data had been re-analysed ___ the original error come to light.
- The sample was small; ___, the results were consistent across all three sites.
- The authors ___ their claims with several caveats, noting that more work is needed.
- The new theory has been ___ a good deal of scepticism.
- The research, the findings of ___ are freely available, was funded by a charity.
- Had the researchers ___ the sample earlier, they might have avoided the bias.
Parte 2: Huecos abiertos
Escribe una palabra en cada hueco.
- The report stops ___ of claiming that the drug is completely safe.
- The effect, ___ far as the evidence suggests, is modest.
- Little ___ the researchers know that their error would be exposed within a week.
- Convincing ___ they may seem, the results do not prove a causal link.
- The scientists were reluctant to speculate ___ the cause until more data came in.
- Rather ___ accept the findings at face value, the editor asked for an independent review.
- The journal has a policy ___ which every paper must include a statement on funding.
- Whatever the merits of the study, it cannot be taken ___ proof that the treatment works.
Parte 3: Formación de palabras
Usa la palabra en MAYÚSCULAS al final de cada frase para formar una palabra que encaje en el hueco. Escribe una sola palabra.
- Critics described the sampling as ___ and open to bias. (SYSTEM)
- The ___ of the findings has been questioned by several teams. (VALID)
- Her claim was never ___ by independent evidence. (SUBSTANCE)
- There is widespread ___ with the way results are reported, and many scientists are calling for reform. (SATISFY)
- The committee's commitment to ___ reassured the public. (TRANSPARENT)
- It would be ___ to draw firm conclusions from so little data. (WISE)
- The ___ of the team's approach lay in combining two methods. (ORIGIN)
- The figures were ___ presented in the press release. (MISLEAD)
Respuestas
Parte 1: Huecos de opción múltiple
- c) overplayTo overplay something es exagerar su importancia. Los demás verbos tienen otros significados.
- a) necessarilyDoes not necessarily imply es una estructura fija. Hardly crearía una doble negación.
- d) didDespués de una expresión temporal negativa al comienzo, se invierten el sujeto y el auxiliar: did the error come to light.
- b) even soEven so introduce un contraste con lo que se acaba de decir. Los demás conectores no encajan con la lógica.
- b) qualifyTo qualify a claim significa «limitarla añadiendo condiciones o cautelas».
- c) met withBe met with scepticism significa «que la gente reacciona ante algo con duda».
- d) whichDespués de una preposición (of) usamos which para las cosas: the findings of which.
- b) widenedEs un tercer condicional invertido: Had + sujeto + participio pasado. Los investigadores fueron quienes ampliaron, así que usamos la voz activa widened.
Parte 2: Huecos abiertos
- shortStop short of doing something significa «llegar casi hasta hacerlo, pero no del todo».
- as / soAs far as y so far as son ambas correctas y significan «en la medida en que».
- didUn adverbio negativo como little al comienzo de una oración requiere inversión: did the researchers know.
- as / thoughLa estructura adjetivo + as/though + sujeto + may/might significa «por convincentes que parezcan».
- about / on / over / upon / regarding / concerningSpeculate about, on, upon u over something son todas posibles; regarding y concerning también sirven.
- thanRather than + infinitivo significa «en lugar de hacer algo».
- under / byA policy under which o by which describe una norma que se aplica a todos.
- asTake something as proof o as evidence significa «considerarlo una prueba».
Parte 3: Formación de palabras
- unsystematic / nonsystematic / non-systematicNecesitamos un adjetivo de significado negativo: unsystematic (o non-systematic).
- validityDespués de the necesitamos un sustantivo. El sustantivo de valid es validity.
- substantiatedLa pasiva was never ... by necesita un participio pasado. De substance formamos el verbo substantiate, por lo que substantiated.
- dissatisfactionEl sustantivo necesita un prefijo negativo: dissatisfaction.
- transparencyDespués de una preposición necesitamos un sustantivo: transparency.
- unwiseBe + adjetivo: el sentido es negativo, por lo que unwise.
- originalityEl sujeto necesita un sustantivo que signifique «la cualidad de ser nuevo»: originality.
- misleadinglyNecesitamos un adverbio que modifique al participio presented: misleadingly.