Joy English · Nivel B2 · Gobierno e historiajoy-english.com
Los primeros años del Tribunal Supremo de EE. UU.
Nombre:Fecha:
Lee un fragmento de un reportaje de VOA Learning English sobre los inciertos primeros años del Tribunal Supremo de EE. UU. y un famoso caso de 1803.
The Rise of the US Supreme Court
At first, Americans were not sure how important the Supreme Court would be. Not very, some thought.
The court did not even have its own building, but moved from place to place. For a while, it operated out of the U.S. Capitol building in a meeting room lawmakers were not using.
And the position of Supreme Court justice was not highly valued.
One of the first justices, John Jay, resigned from the Supreme Court to become the governor of New York. Later, the president asked Jay to return to the high court. Jay said no. The idea of the federal judiciary had too many problems, he said. He did not think the Supreme Court could ever earn the public’s trust.
So the president at the time, John Adams, asked someone else, John Marshall, to be a Supreme Court justice.
That decision turned out to be very important. During his 34 years in office, beginning in 1801, John Marshall helped shape and strengthen the Supreme Court. One of his most historic decisions came in 1803. That year, Marshall wrote the opinion on a case called Marbury versus Madison.
The case related to a man named William Marbury. He had been offered a government job at the last minute by an outgoing president. The new president and his secretary of state, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, did not want to give Marbury the position for political reasons. But Marbury believed an earlier act of Congress required the president to appoint him. So Marbury took the dispute all the way to the Supreme Court.
The justices at the time agreed that Marbury should get the job. But they did not order Jefferson and Madison to give it to him. Instead, the justices believed, the earlier act of Congress violated the Constitution. So the whole idea behind Marbury’s case could not be justified.
That decision was historic, not because Marbury lost his case, but because of what it said about the Supreme Court. The chief justice claimed the court’s right to tell the rest of the federal government what the Constitution permits them to do.
Comprende el texto
Lee el texto. Elige la respuesta correcta.
- In its early years, the Supreme Court had its own building.
- Why did John Jay leave the Supreme Court?
- Why did Jay refuse to return to the court?
- For how long was John Marshall in office?
- Who had offered William Marbury a government job?
- What did the justices decide about the earlier act of Congress?
- Did the court order Jefferson and Madison to give Marbury the job?
- Why was the decision in Marbury versus Madison historic?
Palabras y detalles
Elige la mejor respuesta o escribe una palabra o un número del texto.
- "The position of Supreme Court justice was not highly valued." This means that ...
- "That decision turned out to be very important." This means it ...
- John Marshall's time in office began in ___.
- Marshall helped "shape and strengthen" the court. Here, shape means ...
- Marbury took the ___ all the way to the Supreme Court.
- "The whole idea behind Marbury's case could not be justified." Justified means ...
Respuestas
Comprende el texto
- b) FalseEl tribunal ni siquiera tenía edificio propio, sino que se trasladaba de un lugar a otro.
- a) To become the governor of New YorkJohn Jay renunció al Tribunal Supremo para ser gobernador de Nueva York.
- b) He did not think the court could ever earn the public's trust.Dijo que el poder judicial federal tenía demasiados problemas y no creía que el tribunal pudiera ganarse nunca la confianza del público.
- c) 34 yearsEl texto dice: During his 34 years in office, beginning in 1801.
- b) An outgoing presidentA Marbury le había ofrecido un puesto en el último momento un presidente saliente. Jefferson y Madison no querían darle el cargo.
- c) It violated the Constitution.Los jueces creían que la ley anterior del Congreso violaba la Constitución.
- a) NoEl texto dice: But they did not order Jefferson and Madison to give it to him.
- b) Because the court claimed the right to tell the government what the Constitution permitsFue histórico no porque Marbury perdiera, sino porque el tribunal se atribuyó el derecho de decir al gobierno federal lo que permite la Constitución.
Palabras y detalles
- a) many people did not think the job was very importantSi algo no se valora mucho, la gente no lo considera muy importante.
- b) was later shown to be very importantTurn out to be significa que algo se descubre o se demuestra más tarde que es cierto.
- 1801Sus 34 años en el cargo comenzaron en 1801.
- c) influence how something developsShape significa influir en la manera en que algo se desarrolla.
- dispute / caseEl texto dice: Marbury took the dispute all the way to the Supreme Court. Un dispute es un desacuerdo grave.
- a) shown to be right or reasonableSi algo está justified, hay buenas razones que demuestran que es correcto.