Joy English · Level C1 · Environmentjoy-english.com
A lecture extract on the urban heat island
Name:Date:
A university lecturer explains why cities are warmer than the countryside, weighs up possible remedies and asks who suffers most.
Audio and answer checking: https://joy-english.com/listening/urban-heat-island-lecture
Attitude, opinion and inference
Listen and choose the best answer. Some answers are not stated directly.
- What is the lecturer's main purpose in this extract?
- According to the lecturer, what is the main cause of the heat island effect?
- What does the lecturer imply when she says "Had planners understood all this a century ago"?
- What is the lecturer's attitude to planting trees?
- What disadvantage of pale roofs does she mention?
- Why does she say the heat island is "a question of fairness"?
- Why does she mention cool rooms in libraries?
- What does the lecturer ask the students to do for next week?
Listen for details
Listen again and type the missing word or number. You can write numbers as words or digits.
- On a calm, clear night, a city can be as much as ___ degrees warmer than the countryside.
- Plants help to cool the air because they lose ___ through their leaves.
- A study of ___ districts tested the effect of pale roofs.
- Pale roofs lowered indoor temperatures by roughly ___ degrees.
- During heatwaves, some cities open cool rooms in public ___.
Answer key
Attitude, opinion and inference
- c) To introduce a familiar urban problem and assess ways of dealing with itShe introduces the heat island, explains its causes and then weighs up several responses, including their drawbacks.
- b) Surfaces that absorb sunlight and release the heat after darkShe says engines and air conditioners contribute only modestly; the larger factor is surfaces such as stone and asphalt.
- a) The problem might have been avoided with better knowledgeThe structure "Had ... understood, they might have designed differently" suggests that earlier design could have been better with knowledge.
- d) It is helpful, but only under certain conditionsShe says trees work, but only where there is room for roots and water; a struggling tree may cool nothing.
- c) They can create glare for people in the streetShe says reflective surfaces can bounce glare into the street, which is not ideal for pedestrians.
- b) The hottest areas are often home to people least able to copeShe points out that the hottest streets have the fewest parks and are often where older and low-income residents live.
- d) To show that a simple, cheap measure can be valuableShe says the rooms cost very little and may save lives, so they illustrate a low-cost, non-technical response.
- a) Compare two case studies and judge which approach is betterShe asks them to read two case studies and decide which approach they find more convincing, and why.
Listen for details
- eight / 8The lecturer says the difference can reach as much as eight degrees.
- waterShe says plants lose water through their leaves, which draws heat out of the air.
- twelve / 12The study she mentions covered twelve districts.
- three / 3They lowered temperatures by roughly three degrees.
- librariesShe says some cities have opened cool rooms in public libraries.
Transcript
Doctor Haddad: Good morning, everyone. Today I want to look at a phenomenon that most of you will have felt without ever naming it: the urban heat island. In essence, a city is warmer than the countryside around it, and on a calm, clear night the difference can reach as much as eight degrees.
Doctor Haddad: Why does this happen? Not, as is often assumed, because cities generate so much heat of their own. Engines and air conditioners do contribute, but their share is modest. The larger factor is surface. Stone, brick and asphalt soak up sunlight all day and release it slowly after dark, whereas soil and vegetation stay cooler, partly because plants lose water through their leaves, which draws heat out of the air.
Doctor Haddad: Why does the night matter so much? Because the body needs a cool period in which to recover. When nights stay hot, people sleep badly, and the health effects build up over days rather than hours.
Doctor Haddad: Had planners understood all this a century ago, they might have designed very differently. Instead, we inherited streets lined with dark surfaces and hardly any shade. Rarely do we stop to consider that a single paved car park can raise the temperature of an entire neighbourhood by a degree or more.
Doctor Haddad: Now, a word of caution about the solutions. Planting trees is the obvious answer, and it does work, but only where there is room for roots and a reliable supply of water. A tree struggling in a narrow pavement pit may cool nothing at all. Pale roofs are cheaper and quicker. In a study of twelve districts, they lowered indoor temperatures by roughly three degrees. Yet reflective surfaces can also bounce glare into the street, which is hardly ideal for pedestrians.
Doctor Haddad: What I find most interesting, however, is the question of who bears the burden. Heat is not shared evenly. The hottest streets tend to be those with the fewest parks, and those are often where older residents and low-income families live. So the heat island is not merely an engineering puzzle; it is a question of fairness.
Doctor Haddad: I'm not suggesting that every problem has a technical fix. Some cities have simply opened cool rooms in public libraries during heatwaves, which costs very little and may well save lives. Others have asked residents to paint their own roofs white, with mixed results. For next week, I'd like you to read the two case studies on the reading list and decide which approach you find more convincing, and why.