Joy English · Livello C2 · Linguajoy-english.com
Un dibattito in studio sulla traduzione fedele
Nome:Data:
Due traduttori con istinti opposti discutono, con arguzia e senza molta pietà, se una traduzione debba restare fedele o scorrere in modo fluido.
Audio e correzione delle risposte: https://joy-english.com/it/listening/translation-fidelity-panel-debate
Opinioni, ironia e atteggiamento
Ascolta la registrazione. Scegli la risposta migliore. Pensa a ciò che è implicito oltre a ciò che è detto.
- What is the main question the guests discuss?
- What does Fabian imply by "I shall resist the suspicion, though only for a sentence"?
- How does Tola react to the image of the translator as a guest?
- According to Fabian, what does a translator who smooths an awkward word do?
- What does Tola mean by "Both of ours, which is rather the point"?
- In which case does Fabian grudgingly agree with Tola?
- What is Tola's regret?
- Why does Fabian say "Please don't say that in public"?
Dettagli chiave
Ascolta di nuovo. Scrivi una parola o un numero dalla registrazione per completare ogni frase.
- Fabian has spent ___ years translating medieval poetry.
- Tola says that if a joke needs a ___, it has stopped being a joke.
- Fabian says people in a novel do not speak like ___.
- Fabian says his students describe his early translations as ___.
- Tola replaced a local word for a particular kind of ___.
- Tola wants an English reader to laugh when a ___ reader would.
Soluzioni
Opinioni, ironia e atteggiamento
- b) Whether a translation should stay close to the original or read smoothlyNaomi chiede se una traduzione debba essere fedele o leggibile.
- c) That Naomi is right and he is eager to speakScherza dicendo che si tratterrà solo per poco, il che equivale ad ammettere che è impaziente di parlare per primo.
- a) She finds it charming but mocks it for ignoring the readerLo definisce affascinante, ma il suo commento ironico sulla casa scomoda mostra che pensa trascuri il lettore.
- d) Pleases himself rather than the readerDice che un traduttore del genere non ha aiutato il lettore ma ha lusingato se stesso.
- c) Every translation is shaped by two people, so it is never untouchedIntende che l'originale viene sempre cambiato dal traduttore, quindi entrambi i nomi hanno diritto di comparire.
- b) Spoken dialogue in novelsConcede che il dialogo deve suonare naturale e che una resa letterale suonerebbe come un documento legale.
- d) That she replaced a local word with a plain English oneHa sostituito la parola locale per nebbia con un semplice fog e pensa che i lettori abbiano perso qualcosa.
- a) He is joking about protecting his image as stubbornÈ una battuta: ci tiene alla sua fama di ostinato, e dare ragione la danneggerebbe.
Dettagli chiave
- twenty / 20Naomi lo presenta come uno che ha passato vent'anni sulla poesia medievale.
- footnoteDice che una battuta che ha bisogno di una nota a piè di pagina non è più una battuta.
- footnotesDice che le persone in un romanzo non parlano come note a piè di pagina.
- braveDice che li descrivono, con gentilezza, come coraggiosi.
- fogLa parola locale indicava un solo tipo di nebbia.
- FrenchVuole che il lettore inglese rida nel momento in cui riderebbe un lettore francese.
Trascrizione
Naomi: Welcome to Word for Word. Tonight we ask a question that translators have argued about, politely and otherwise, for centuries: should a translation be faithful, or should it be readable? With me are Doctor Fabian Roux, who has spent twenty years translating medieval poetry, and Tola Adeyemi, who translates contemporary novels. Fabian, I suspect you'll want to go first.
Fabian: I shall resist the suspicion, though only for a sentence. My view is that a translator is a guest in someone else's house, and one does not rearrange the furniture. If the poet chose an awkward word, the awkwardness is part of the poem, and a translator who smooths it away has not helped the reader but flattered himself.
Tola: What a charming picture, and how convenient that the guest never has to explain to anyone why the house is so uncomfortable. I'd say the reader is the one who matters. If a joke needs a footnote, it has stopped being a joke. My job is to make an English reader laugh at the same moment a French reader would, even if I have to build a different joke to do it.
Fabian: Build a different joke, and you have written a different book. Whose name goes on the cover?
Tola: Both of ours, which is rather the point. Nobody pretends the novel reached you untouched. The only question is whether the touching was done with skill.
Naomi: Let me press you on that, Tola. Isn't there a danger that a fluent translation persuades readers that the foreign author was simply an English writer in disguise?
Tola: A real danger, and a flattering one for English. I try to leave a little strangeness in, a rhythm or an image that an English writer wouldn't quite choose, so that the reader senses a different mind at work.
Naomi: Fabian, is there any case in which you'd concede?
Fabian: Several, and I'm irritated to say so. Dialogue, for one. People in a novel do not speak like footnotes. If a character in the original swears, hesitates or sulks, the English must do likewise, and a literal rendering would make her sound like a legal document. I'd also concede that my own early translations, which I regarded as models of loyalty, are now unreadable. My students describe them, kindly, as brave.
Tola: I'll make a concession in return. When I worked on a novel set in a fishing village, I replaced a local word for one particular kind of fog with plain English fog. It was neat, it was fluent, and I have regretted it ever since. The reader lost something they would have enjoyed learning.
Naomi: So you've both moved towards the middle.
Fabian: Please don't say that in public. It would ruin my reputation for obstinacy.
Tola: Mine is already ruined, so I'm happy to be quoted. The truth is that the best translations feel faithful in spirit and free in detail, and nobody has ever agreed on which is which.
Naomi: On that note of cheerful disagreement, we'll take a short break.