Joy English · Level C2 · Historyjoy-english.com

A lecture on how railways standardised the clock

Name:Date:

A historian explains how railway timetables forced towns to give up local sun time, and what that change quietly cost.

Audio and answer checking: https://joy-english.com/listening/railway-time-lecture-standard-clocks

Argument, tone and inference

Listen to the recording. Choose the best answer. Think about what is implied as well as what is said.

  1. What is the main subject of the lecture?
    • a) How railways were built across the country
    • b) How a shared national time replaced local time
    • c) How the telegraph changed communication
    • d) How watches became cheaper
  2. Why did differences between town clocks cause little trouble before railways?
    • a) Few people owned clocks
    • b) Towns agreed to ignore the differences
    • c) Journeys were so slow that small differences were not noticed
    • d) Every town used the same church clock
  3. Why does the speaker call a clock with two minute hands "the most honest and least useful instrument"?
    • a) It was accurate but unreliable
    • b) It showed both times truthfully but confused everyone
    • c) It was famous for being expensive
    • d) It was honest because it was old
  4. What does she mean by "a timetable is a promise made in minutes"?
    • a) Trains were often late
    • b) Passengers wrote their own timetables
    • c) A timetable requires everyone to share one clock
    • d) Railway companies guaranteed refunds
  5. Why did some towns keep their own time after eighteen forty?
    • a) A law told them to
    • b) No law required them to change, and some were proud or suspicious
    • c) The railway companies paid them to
    • d) Their clocks could not be altered
  6. What did the telegraph contribute?
    • a) It replaced the railway timetable
    • b) It made local noon more accurate
    • c) It could send the exact time to every station at once
    • d) It recorded the movements of the sun
  7. What does she think was "surrendered" with local noon?
    • a) A source of income for jewellers
    • b) A shared experience tied to a place and a sky
    • c) The use of church bells
    • d) Accuracy in measuring distance
  8. What does she mean by an invention succeeding "by being forgotten as one"?
    • a) People are able to copy it more easily
    • b) Its inventor is soon unknown
    • c) It becomes so familiar that it seems always to have existed
    • d) It is replaced by something better

Key details

Listen again. Type one word or number from the recording to complete each sentence.

  1. Bristol ran roughly ___ minutes behind London.
  2. Exeter was about ___ minutes behind London.
  3. One company adopted London time along its whole line in ___.
  4. A law made one standard time official throughout the country in ___.
  5. Before railways, every town set its clocks by the ___.
  6. One famous clock in the west of England had two ___ hands.

Answer key

Argument, tone and inference

  1. b) How a shared national time replaced local timeShe explains how standard time came about, partly because of railways.
  2. c) Journeys were so slow that small differences were not noticedA coach took days, so a few minutes of disagreement was lost along the way.
  3. b) It showed both times truthfully but confused everyoneIt displayed both local and London time honestly, which made reading it difficult; the remark is ironic.
  4. c) A timetable requires everyone to share one clockA promise made in minutes only works if everyone counts minutes by the same clock.
  5. b) No law required them to change, and some were proud or suspiciousThe arrangement had no legal force, so towns were free to refuse, some out of pride or stubbornness.
  6. c) It could send the exact time to every station at onceShe says a signal along the wires could carry the exact time from an observatory to all stations.
  7. b) A shared experience tied to a place and a skyShe says local noon was a shared experience tied to place and sky.
  8. c) It becomes so familiar that it seems always to have existedPeople soon said the clock had always been like that, so the invention was no longer seen as new.

Key details

  1. ten / 10She says Bristol ran roughly ten minutes behind.
  2. fourteen / 14She says Exeter ran about fourteen minutes behind.
  3. 1840 / eighteen fortyThe company adopted London time in eighteen forty.
  4. 1880 / eighteen eightyShe says it was in eighteen eighty.
  5. sunTowns set their clocks by the sun.
  6. minuteIt was fitted with two minute hands.

Transcript

Doctor Marsh: Today I want to talk about something so ordinary that we have stopped noticing it: the fact that, in this country, a clock in the north and a clock in the south agree. This was not always so, and the story of how it came about is, I think, a small masterpiece of unintended consequences.

Doctor Marsh: Until the middle of the nineteenth century, every town set its clocks by the sun. Noon was whenever the sun stood highest overhead, and since the sun reaches that point later as one travels west, Bristol ran roughly ten minutes behind London, and Exeter about fourteen. Nobody found this alarming. A coach took days to complete a journey, and a few minutes of disagreement between two distant towns was simply lost on the road.

Doctor Marsh: The railways changed that, not because anybody wished to reform timekeeping, but because a timetable is a promise made in minutes. A train that left London at nine could hardly arrive at a western station by a clock that insisted it was ten past. Passengers missed trains they had reached early. Station staff kept two sets of times. At least one famous clock in the west of England was fitted with two minute hands, one for local time and one for London time, which must have made it the most honest and least useful instrument in the county.

Doctor Marsh: Consider the practical difficulty. A traveller arriving from a town further east would find that the station clock disagreed with the church clock, which in turn disagreed with the jeweller's window, and each of these authorities had its defenders. Shopkeepers, in particular, were reluctant to alter hours that their customers had always understood.

Doctor Marsh: One company adopted London time along its whole line in eighteen forty, and others followed over the next few years. Yet the arrangement had no legal force. For decades a town could set its own time and be perfectly entitled to do so, and some did, out of pride, or stubbornness, or a suspicion that the capital was getting above itself. It was only in eighteen eighty that a law made one standard time official throughout the country. The telegraph helped enormously, since a signal sent along the wires could carry the exact time from an observatory to every station at once.

Doctor Marsh: It would be tempting to call this progress and leave it there. But notice what was surrendered. Local noon had been a shared experience, tied to a place and a sky. Standard time replaced it with an agreement, and agreements are only as strong as the habits that sustain them. Within a generation, people were saying that the clock had always been like that, which is exactly how an invention succeeds: by being forgotten as one.

Doctor Marsh: So the next time you glance at your watch, spare a thought for the passengers who missed trains they had reached early. They paid, in a very literal way, for a convenience you take entirely for granted.