Joy English · Livello C1 · Psicologiajoy-english.com
Un podcast su fotografie e memoria
Nome:Data:
Una conduttrice e due ospiti discutono se registrare tutto con il telefono indebolisca ciò che ricordiamo davvero.
Audio e correzione delle risposte: https://joy-english.com/it/listening/digital-memory-podcast
Atteggiamento, opinione e inferenza
Ascolta e scegli la risposta migliore. Alcune risposte non sono dette direttamente.
- What is Callum's attitude to the suggestion that phones damage memory?
- According to Callum, why do people remember fewer details of photographed objects?
- When does the effect Callum describes disappear?
- What point does Tamsin make from her experience with old prints?
- What is Callum more concerned about than the number of photographs?
- Why does Tamsin say her advice "sounds odd"?
- What is Callum's reservation about apps that resurface old pictures?
- Why does Tamsin value ordinary days?
Ascoltare i dettagli
Ascolta di nuovo e scrivi la parola o il numero mancante. Puoi scrivere i numeri in lettere o in cifre.
- Callum Reid is a cognitive ___.
- People bring Tamsin old prints in ___.
- Tamsin recommends a selection of ___ pictures with names and dates on the back.
- Callum suggests finding out what you can recall a ___ later.
- Tamsin asks listeners to speak to the ___ relative they know.
Soluzioni
Atteggiamento, opinione e inferenza
- b) He accepts there is an effect but thinks it is limitedRifiuta la parola damaging e dice che l'effetto è piccolo e può scomparire.
- d) They rely on the camera and attend less closelyDice che affidiamo alla fotocamera il compito di ricordare, quindi prestiamo meno attenzione.
- a) When people concentrate on a specific detailIngrandire una caratteristica particolare costringe le persone a guardare bene.
- c) Stories told later keep a memory alive more than the image doesDice che le persone ricordano la storia raccontata dopo, non la giornata in sé; il racconto mantiene vivo il ricordo.
- d) Nobody sorts the images or looks at them againDice che le immagini non ordinate valgono quasi nulla perché nessuno ci ritorna o sceglie quali contano.
- b) Someone in her job would be expected to keep everythingLavora con un archivio, quindi sentirle dire di buttare le cose sembra sorprendente.
- c) They may give a one-sided, flattering view of the pastDice che possono offrirci una versione levigata, così ricordiamo i momenti salienti anziché i giorni ordinari.
- a) They show how life was really lived, which historians will want to knowDice che gli storici del futuro vorranno i giorni ordinari, perché quella è la vita realmente vissuta.
Ascoltare i dettagli
- psychologistNoor lo presenta come psicologo cognitivo.
- shoeboxes / shoe boxesDice che le persone le portano scatole da scarpe piene di vecchie stampe.
- thirty / 30Menziona una selezione di trenta immagini con nomi e date scritti sul retro.
- monthDice di vedere che cosa riesci a ricordare tra un mese.
- oldestDice di telefonare al parente più anziano che conosci.
Trascrizione
Noor: Welcome back to Thinking Aloud. This week we're asking whether keeping a record of everything makes us remember less. My guests are Callum Reid, a cognitive psychologist, and Tamsin Okafor, who looks after a community archive of family photographs. Callum, is our phone-filled lifestyle quietly damaging our memories?
Callum: I'd resist the word damaging. There is some evidence that people who photograph an object remember fewer of its details than people who simply look at it. The likeliest explanation is that we hand the job of remembering to the camera, so we pay less attention. But the effect is small, and it disappears if people are asked to zoom in on one particular feature, because that forces them to look properly.
Tamsin: That rings true from my side of things. People bring me shoeboxes of old prints, and they rarely remember the day a picture was taken. What they remember is the story that was told about it afterwards. It's the retelling that keeps the memory alive, not the picture itself.
Noor: So the photograph is a prompt, rather than the memory.
Callum: Precisely, and that's why I'm less worried about quantity than about what happens next. Thousands of unsorted images are almost worthless, because nobody ever returns to them. Not only do we fail to revisit them, we rarely even choose which ones matter.
Tamsin: Which is why I tell families to throw things away. It sounds odd coming from someone in my job, I know. But a selection of thirty pictures with names and dates written on the back will mean far more to a grandchild than thirty thousand files that nobody can search.
Noor: Does the technology make that kind of selection easier or harder?
Callum: Both, really. Apps that resurface old pictures can spark genuine recollection, but they sometimes feed us a polished version of the past. We may end up remembering the highlights rather than the ordinary days that made up most of our lives.
Tamsin: I'd go further. The ordinary days are exactly what future historians will want. Hardly anyone photographs a Tuesday afternoon, yet that's the life that was actually lived.
Noor: A final thought from each of you. What would you ask listeners to do this week?
Callum: Put your phone away at one event and see what you can recall a month from now. Treat it as a small experiment, not a rule.
Tamsin: Choose one photograph, ring the oldest relative you know, and ask them what was happening just outside the frame.