Joy English · Level C1 · Psikologijoy-english.com
Podcast tentang foto dan ingatan
Nama:Tanggal:
Seorang pembawa acara dan dua narasumber membahas apakah merekam segalanya dengan ponsel melemahkan apa yang sebenarnya kita ingat.
Audio dan pemeriksaan jawaban: https://joy-english.com/id/listening/digital-memory-podcast
Sikap, pendapat, dan kesimpulan
Simak lalu pilih jawaban yang paling tepat. Beberapa jawaban tidak dinyatakan secara langsung.
- What is Callum's attitude to the suggestion that phones damage memory?
- According to Callum, why do people remember fewer details of photographed objects?
- When does the effect Callum describes disappear?
- What point does Tamsin make from her experience with old prints?
- What is Callum more concerned about than the number of photographs?
- Why does Tamsin say her advice "sounds odd"?
- What is Callum's reservation about apps that resurface old pictures?
- Why does Tamsin value ordinary days?
Menyimak detail
Dengarkan lagi dan ketik kata atau angka yang hilang. Kamu boleh menulis angka dengan kata atau digit.
- Callum Reid is a cognitive ___.
- People bring Tamsin old prints in ___.
- Tamsin recommends a selection of ___ pictures with names and dates on the back.
- Callum suggests finding out what you can recall a ___ later.
- Tamsin asks listeners to speak to the ___ relative they know.
Kunci jawaban
Sikap, pendapat, dan kesimpulan
- b) He accepts there is an effect but thinks it is limitedIa menolak kata merusak dan mengatakan pengaruhnya kecil dan bisa hilang.
- d) They rely on the camera and attend less closelyIa mengatakan kita menyerahkan tugas mengingat kepada kamera, sehingga kita kurang memperhatikan.
- a) When people concentrate on a specific detailMemperbesar satu detail tertentu memaksa orang untuk benar-benar memperhatikan.
- c) Stories told later keep a memory alive more than the image doesIa mengatakan orang mengingat cerita yang dituturkan sesudahnya, bukan hari itu sendiri; menceritakan kembali menjaga ingatan tetap hidup.
- d) Nobody sorts the images or looks at them againIa mengatakan gambar yang tidak dipilah hampir tak berharga karena tak seorang pun kembali melihatnya atau memilih mana yang penting.
- b) Someone in her job would be expected to keep everythingIa bekerja di sebuah arsip, jadi mengatakan kepada orang untuk membuang barang terasa mengejutkan jika datang darinya.
- c) They may give a one-sided, flattering view of the pastIa mengatakan foto-foto itu dapat menyuguhkan versi yang dipoles kepada kita, sehingga kita mengingat momen-momen terbaik dan bukan hari-hari biasa.
- a) They show how life was really lived, which historians will want to knowIa mengatakan sejarawan masa depan akan menginginkan hari-hari biasa, karena itulah kehidupan yang sebenarnya dijalani.
Menyimak detail
- psychologistNoor memperkenalkannya sebagai psikolog kognitif.
- shoeboxes / shoe boxesIa mengatakan orang membawakan kotak sepatu berisi cetakan foto lama kepadanya.
- thirty / 30Ia menyebut pilihan tiga puluh gambar yang nama dan tanggalnya tertulis di bagian belakang.
- monthIa mengatakan lihat apa yang bisa kamu ingat sebulan dari sekarang.
- oldestIa mengatakan telepon orang tertua dalam keluarga yang kamu kenal.
Transkrip
Noor: Welcome back to Thinking Aloud. This week we're asking whether keeping a record of everything makes us remember less. My guests are Callum Reid, a cognitive psychologist, and Tamsin Okafor, who looks after a community archive of family photographs. Callum, is our phone-filled lifestyle quietly damaging our memories?
Callum: I'd resist the word damaging. There is some evidence that people who photograph an object remember fewer of its details than people who simply look at it. The likeliest explanation is that we hand the job of remembering to the camera, so we pay less attention. But the effect is small, and it disappears if people are asked to zoom in on one particular feature, because that forces them to look properly.
Tamsin: That rings true from my side of things. People bring me shoeboxes of old prints, and they rarely remember the day a picture was taken. What they remember is the story that was told about it afterwards. It's the retelling that keeps the memory alive, not the picture itself.
Noor: So the photograph is a prompt, rather than the memory.
Callum: Precisely, and that's why I'm less worried about quantity than about what happens next. Thousands of unsorted images are almost worthless, because nobody ever returns to them. Not only do we fail to revisit them, we rarely even choose which ones matter.
Tamsin: Which is why I tell families to throw things away. It sounds odd coming from someone in my job, I know. But a selection of thirty pictures with names and dates written on the back will mean far more to a grandchild than thirty thousand files that nobody can search.
Noor: Does the technology make that kind of selection easier or harder?
Callum: Both, really. Apps that resurface old pictures can spark genuine recollection, but they sometimes feed us a polished version of the past. We may end up remembering the highlights rather than the ordinary days that made up most of our lives.
Tamsin: I'd go further. The ordinary days are exactly what future historians will want. Hardly anyone photographs a Tuesday afternoon, yet that's the life that was actually lived.
Noor: A final thought from each of you. What would you ask listeners to do this week?
Callum: Put your phone away at one event and see what you can recall a month from now. Treat it as a small experiment, not a rule.
Tamsin: Choose one photograph, ring the oldest relative you know, and ask them what was happening just outside the frame.