Joy English · Nivel C1 · Psicologíajoy-english.com
Un pódcast sobre fotografías y memoria
Nombre:Fecha:
Una presentadora y dos invitados debaten si grabarlo todo con el teléfono debilita lo que realmente recordamos.
Audio y corrección de respuestas: https://joy-english.com/es/listening/digital-memory-podcast
Actitud, opinión e inferencia
Escucha y elige la mejor respuesta. Algunas respuestas no se dicen de forma directa.
- What is Callum's attitude to the suggestion that phones damage memory?
- According to Callum, why do people remember fewer details of photographed objects?
- When does the effect Callum describes disappear?
- What point does Tamsin make from her experience with old prints?
- What is Callum more concerned about than the number of photographs?
- Why does Tamsin say her advice "sounds odd"?
- What is Callum's reservation about apps that resurface old pictures?
- Why does Tamsin value ordinary days?
Escucha los detalles
Escucha otra vez y escribe la palabra o el número que falta. Puedes escribir los números con palabras o con cifras.
- Callum Reid is a cognitive ___.
- People bring Tamsin old prints in ___.
- Tamsin recommends a selection of ___ pictures with names and dates on the back.
- Callum suggests finding out what you can recall a ___ later.
- Tamsin asks listeners to speak to the ___ relative they know.
Respuestas
Actitud, opinión e inferencia
- b) He accepts there is an effect but thinks it is limitedSe resiste a usar la palabra damaging y dice que el efecto es pequeño y puede desaparecer.
- d) They rely on the camera and attend less closelyDice que le encargamos la tarea de recordar a la cámara, así que prestamos menos atención.
- a) When people concentrate on a specific detailAcercarse a un rasgo concreto obliga a la gente a mirar con atención.
- c) Stories told later keep a memory alive more than the image doesDice que la gente recuerda la historia que se cuenta después, no el día en sí; volver a contarla mantiene vivo el recuerdo.
- d) Nobody sorts the images or looks at them againDice que las imágenes sin clasificar casi no valen nada porque nadie vuelve a ellas ni elige cuáles importan.
- b) Someone in her job would be expected to keep everythingElla trabaja con un archivo, así que resulta sorprendente que sea ella quien diga a la gente que tire cosas.
- c) They may give a one-sided, flattering view of the pastDice que pueden ofrecernos una versión pulida, de modo que recordamos los momentos destacados en lugar de los días normales.
- a) They show how life was really lived, which historians will want to knowDice que los historiadores del futuro querrán los días normales, porque esa es la vida realmente vivida.
Escucha los detalles
- psychologistNoor lo presenta como psicólogo cognitivo.
- shoeboxes / shoe boxesDice que la gente le trae cajas de zapatos con fotos antiguas.
- thirty / 30Menciona una selección de treinta fotografías con nombres y fechas escritos en el reverso.
- monthDice que veas qué eres capaz de recordar dentro de un mes.
- oldestDice que llames por teléfono al pariente más anciano que conozcas.
Transcripción
Noor: Welcome back to Thinking Aloud. This week we're asking whether keeping a record of everything makes us remember less. My guests are Callum Reid, a cognitive psychologist, and Tamsin Okafor, who looks after a community archive of family photographs. Callum, is our phone-filled lifestyle quietly damaging our memories?
Callum: I'd resist the word damaging. There is some evidence that people who photograph an object remember fewer of its details than people who simply look at it. The likeliest explanation is that we hand the job of remembering to the camera, so we pay less attention. But the effect is small, and it disappears if people are asked to zoom in on one particular feature, because that forces them to look properly.
Tamsin: That rings true from my side of things. People bring me shoeboxes of old prints, and they rarely remember the day a picture was taken. What they remember is the story that was told about it afterwards. It's the retelling that keeps the memory alive, not the picture itself.
Noor: So the photograph is a prompt, rather than the memory.
Callum: Precisely, and that's why I'm less worried about quantity than about what happens next. Thousands of unsorted images are almost worthless, because nobody ever returns to them. Not only do we fail to revisit them, we rarely even choose which ones matter.
Tamsin: Which is why I tell families to throw things away. It sounds odd coming from someone in my job, I know. But a selection of thirty pictures with names and dates written on the back will mean far more to a grandchild than thirty thousand files that nobody can search.
Noor: Does the technology make that kind of selection easier or harder?
Callum: Both, really. Apps that resurface old pictures can spark genuine recollection, but they sometimes feed us a polished version of the past. We may end up remembering the highlights rather than the ordinary days that made up most of our lives.
Tamsin: I'd go further. The ordinary days are exactly what future historians will want. Hardly anyone photographs a Tuesday afternoon, yet that's the life that was actually lived.
Noor: A final thought from each of you. What would you ask listeners to do this week?
Callum: Put your phone away at one event and see what you can recall a month from now. Treat it as a small experiment, not a rule.
Tamsin: Choose one photograph, ring the oldest relative you know, and ask them what was happening just outside the frame.