Joy English · Livello C2 · Geografiajoy-english.com
Una lezione su ciò che le mappe omettono
Nome:Data:
Un docente universitario sostiene che ogni mappa è un insieme di scelte e che gli spazi vuoti ci dicono tanto quanto le linee tracciate.
Audio e correzione delle risposte: https://joy-english.com/it/listening/cartography-silent-maps-lecture
Argomentazione, atteggiamento e implicazione
Ascolta la registrazione. Scegli la risposta migliore. Pensa a ciò che è implicito oltre a ciò che è detto.
- What is the lecturer's central claim?
- Why did eighteenth-century chart makers draw particular rocks?
- What does the story of Mr Pellham suggest about the marshes?
- According to the lecturer, what separates a silence from a simplification?
- How does the lecturer respond to the objection about scale?
- Why does he mention the navigation application and the narrow lane?
- What is the lecturer's attitude to the student's word "lie"?
- What practical advice does he give for reading a map?
Dettagli chiave
Ascolta di nuovo. Scrivi una parola o un numero dalla registrazione per completare ogni frase.
- Mr Pellham spent ___ summers measuring the sandbanks.
- The lecturer jokes that a map as large as the territory would be ___.
- By an algorithm, the narrow lane was promoted from an afterthought to a ___.
- The residents of the lane were ___ to find it crowded with lorries.
- A map is described as evidence from a witness with an ___.
Soluzioni
Argomentazione, atteggiamento e implicazione
- c) Maps reflect choices about what is worth recordingDice che una mappa è una decisione su ciò che merita di essere ricordato, non una finestra sul mondo.
- b) They were the rocks that had wrecked shipsDice che disegnavano le rocce che avevano affondato navi, quindi la carta registra la sventura.
- c) They did not interest the people paying for the surveyErano ben note a livello locale ma non portavano denaro ai suoi mecenati, quindi sulla carta non esistevano.
- a) A silence can never be put right because the information was never gatheredUna semplificazione si può invertire con un foglio più grande; un silenzio no, perché nessuno ha raccolto il dettaglio.
- b) He accepts it only in partDice di accettarla "up to a point" e poi introduce un'ulteriore distinzione.
- c) To show that what a map includes can have real effects on people who were not consultedIl vicolo è diventato una scorciatoia a causa di una scelta fatta altrove, e i suoi residenti non sono stati consultati.
- a) He thinks it is too strong, because most selection is not intended to deceiveRifiuta la parola perché una bugia richiede l'intenzione di ingannare, e la maggior parte delle selezioni nasce dall'abitudine o dalla comodità.
- d) Ask who made it, for whom, and what is missingRaccomanda di chiedersi chi ha fatto la mappa, per chi, e che cosa avrebbe perso includendo ciò che manca.
Dettagli chiave
- three / 3Il docente dice di aver passato tre estati sui banchi di sabbia.
- uselessLa vecchia battuta è che una mappa del genere sarebbe inutile.
- shortcut / short cutIl docente dice che è stato promosso da dettaglio trascurato a scorciatoia.
- bemusedDice che erano perplessi per l'improvviso traffico.
- interestConclude definendo una mappa una buona prova fornita da un testimone con un interesse.
Trascrizione
Professor Lindqvist: Good morning. Last week I suggested that every map is an argument, and several of you looked at me as though I had said something faintly indecent. So let me defend the claim. A map is not a window onto the world; it is a decision about what deserves to be remembered. Consider the humble coastal chart of the eighteenth century. Its makers did not draw rocks because rocks exist. They drew the rocks that had sunk ships, which is to say they drew a history of misfortune and called it geography.
Professor Lindqvist: Now, the interesting part is what these charts leave blank. A white space on a map is rarely an absence of knowledge. More often it is an absence of interest. The surveyor of a certain northern estuary, whom I shall call Mr Pellham, spent three summers measuring its sandbanks, and then, quite deliberately, drew the inland marshes as a pale, featureless wash. The marshes were well known to every local fisherman. They simply earned no money for his patrons, and so, on paper, they were not there.
Professor Lindqvist: You might object that this is merely a matter of scale. A map as large as the territory would be useless, as the old joke goes, and omission is the price of usefulness. I accept that, up to a point. But there is a difference between a simplification and a silence, and critical cartography begins with learning to tell them apart. A simplification can be reversed: give me a larger sheet and I will add the detail. A silence cannot, because nobody ever collected the detail in the first place.
Professor Lindqvist: Let me offer a modern parallel, since I'm told that anything older than a decade strikes you as antique. Navigation applications now choose routes for millions of drivers, and they quietly favour wide, fast roads. Residents of a narrow lane in a hill town I visited were bemused to find their street suddenly crowded with lorries. Nothing had changed on the ground. The lane had merely been promoted, by an algorithm, from an afterthought to a shortcut, and nobody had asked those who lived there whether they wished to be a shortcut.
Student: Professor, doesn't that make every map a kind of lie? If it's all selection, how can we trust any of them?
Professor Lindqvist: A fair question, though I would resist the word lie. A lie requires an intention to deceive, whereas most selection is made out of habit, convenience, or the wishes of whoever is paying. The remedy is not distrust but literacy. Ask who made the map, for whom, and what they would have lost by including the thing that is missing. Do that, and a map stops being a verdict and becomes what it always was: a very good piece of evidence, from a witness with an interest. And be wary of any map that looks perfectly confident.