Joy English · レベル C1 · IELTS形式joy-english.com
IELTS 形式のリーディング:耳のための都市設計
名前:日付:
IELTS アカデミックのリーディング形式の独自の練習で、公式のテストではありません。都市の騒音についての文章と、段落の照合、意見と人物の照合、文の完成問題があります。
Designing for the ear
A. For decades, the standard response to urban noise has been to measure it and then to reduce it. Sound is expressed in decibels, limits are set, and engineers are asked to bring the figures down by means of barriers, quieter road surfaces and insulated windows. This approach has produced real benefits: sustained exposure to loud noise is linked to raised stress and disturbed sleep, and few people would argue that cities ought to be louder. Yet a growing number of researchers contend that decibel readings capture only part of what people actually experience when they walk down a street, and that a policy based on them alone is bound to miss something important. A quiet street that feels lifeless or unsafe may be less valued by its residents than a lively one with a steady background hum, and a measurement taken at a single moment cannot distinguish between the two.
B. The alternative is to study the soundscape, a term that refers to the whole acoustic environment as perceived by the people who live within it. Dr Ines Varga, an acoustic engineer who has surveyed public squares in several cities, points out that two places with the same average volume can feel entirely different. A fountain at sixty decibels may be welcomed, whereas a delivery lorry at the same level is not. 'The number tells you how much sound there is,' she says, 'but not whether anyone wants to hear it.' Her team asks passers-by to describe each place using words such as calm, lively or chaotic, and then relates their answers to recordings made on the spot. The same method also shows how a place changes with the time of day: a square that residents call peaceful at breakfast may be described as tense by the evening, even though the readings barely move. Dr Varga argues that such differences are exactly what a purely numerical approach hides.
C. Urban planner Kofi Mensah draws a practical conclusion from such work. In his view, the aim should not be silence, which is neither achievable nor, he suspects, desirable in a city, but a deliberate balance. He recommends that planners identify the sounds that give a place its character, such as street musicians, trams or children in a playground, and protect them, while concentrating noise control on sounds that bring no benefit to anyone, such as idling engines. He admits that this is easier said than done. Opinions about what counts as pleasant differ between residents, and a sound that one household enjoys may keep a neighbour awake. Any policy, he concedes, will involve compromise and will never satisfy everybody.
D. Psychologist Dr Lena Hoffmann is more cautious. She welcomes the shift of attention towards perception but warns that questionnaires measure what people say, which does not always match how their bodies respond. In one of her studies, volunteers who listened to recordings of natural sounds reported feeling more relaxed, yet their heart rates changed very little. She does not conclude that the reports are worthless; rather, she argues that planners should not treat a pleasant impression as proof of a health benefit. 'We are at risk of designing for what sounds nice,' she says, 'when we should also be asking what actually helps.' She would like to see larger studies that combine people's own descriptions with physical measurements over several weeks.
E. Whatever the outcome of that debate, some cities are already experimenting. One has added planting to the edges of a busy square, partly because greenery is thought to make a space feel quieter, even though plants absorb very little sound themselves. A second has rerouted delivery vehicles away from a residential street at night, and a third has installed small water features near a busy junction. It is too early to say which of these measures works best, and evaluations are complicated by the fact that people's expectations change once they know a project is under way. Even so, the broader shift is clear. Increasingly, the question planners ask is not simply 'How loud is it?' but 'What is it like to be here?'
情報と段落の照合
次の情報はどの段落に含まれていますか。A から E の正しい文字を選んでください。同じ文字を何度選んでもかまいません。
- a method that links passers-by's descriptions of a place to recordings made there
- an acknowledgement that residents may disagree about which sounds are pleasant
- a description of the traditional ways engineers have tried to lower noise
- a comment that judging the success of new measures is made harder by changing expectations
- an example of a study in which people's reports of how they felt were not reflected in their bodies' responses
- a statement that complete quiet is not a realistic target for a city
- an illustration of two sounds at the same volume being judged differently
意見と人物の照合
次の見解はそれぞれ誰が述べていますか。Dr Ines Varga、Kofi Mensah、Dr Lena Hoffmann のいずれかを選んでください。
- Two places can be equally loud and yet feel very different.
- Planners should protect the sounds that give a place its identity.
- A pleasant impression of a place does not prove that it is good for health.
- Any noise policy will have to involve compromise.
- People may report feeling relaxed without showing any physical sign of it.
- A purely numerical approach hides the way a place can feel different at different times of day.
文の完成
各文を、本文から NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS で完成させてください。
- Traditionally, noise has been measured in ___ and limits have been set.
- The term ___ refers to the whole acoustic environment as people perceive it.
- Mensah thinks noise control should focus on sounds that bring no ___ to anyone.
- Dr Hoffmann's volunteers listened to recordings of ___ sounds.
- Planting may help because greenery is thought to make a space feel ___.
- Evaluations are difficult because people's ___ change once they know a project is under way.
解答
情報と段落の照合
- b) B段落 B は、通行人に音の描写を尋ね、それをその場で録音した音と関連づけていることを述べています。
- c) C段落 C では、住民の間で意見が分かれ、ある世帯にとって心地よい音が隣人を眠れなくさせることもあります。
- a) A段落 A は、防音壁、静かな路面、防音窓に触れています。
- e) E段落 E は、プロジェクトが進行中だと人々が知ると期待が変わるため、評価が複雑になると述べています。
- d) D段落 D では、ボランティアはリラックスしたと答えましたが、心拍数はほとんど変わりませんでした。
- c) C段落 C は、静寂は都市では実現できず、また望ましくもないだろうと彼が考えていると述べています。
- b) B段落 B は、どちらも 60 デシベルの噴水と配送トラックを比較しています。
意見と人物の照合
- a) Dr Ines VargaDr Varga は、平均の音量が同じ場所でも、感じ方がまったく違うことがあると指摘しています。
- b) Kofi MensahMensah は、場所に個性を与える音を見極めて守ることを勧めています。
- c) Dr Lena HoffmannDr Hoffmann は、計画担当者は心地よい印象を健康上の利点の証拠として扱うべきではないと主張しています。
- b) Kofi MensahMensah は、どんな政策にも妥協が伴い、全員を満足させることは決してないと認めています。
- c) Dr Lena HoffmannDr Hoffmann のボランティアは、心拍数はほとんど変わらなかったのにリラックスしたと答えました。
- a) Dr Ines VargaDr Varga は、朝食時は穏やかなのに夕方には緊張感が漂う広場について述べ、そのような違いこそ、純粋に数値だけに頼る方法では見えなくなると主張しています。
文の完成
- decibels段落 A は、音はデシベルで表されると述べています。
- soundscape段落 B は、サウンドスケープを、そこに住む人々が知覚する音響環境全体と定義しています。
- benefit段落 C は、誰にも利益をもたらさない音に触れています。
- natural段落 D は、録音されたのは自然の音だったと述べています。
- quieter段落 E は、緑があると空間が静かに感じられると考えられていると述べています。
- expectations段落 E は、複雑にする要因として、変化する期待を挙げています。